Legal Opinion
City of New York v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 26, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Court of Claims of the State of New York (Alan Marin, J.), entered on or about October 14, 1999, which denied the municipal claimants’ motion and defendant State’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Court of Claims, relying on this Court’s decision in City of New York v Maul (239 AD2d 225), correctly found that this action is properly before it (see, Court of Claims Act § 9 [2]), even though the subject so-ordered stipulation was originally before Supreme Court. The parties’ so-ordered stipulation is not invalid for lack of approval by the State…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Koffman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Towne v. AsadourianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- City of New York v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Church v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Micro-Link, LLC v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- City of New York v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Phillips v. Burgio & Campofelice, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020