Legal Opinion

Bridgehampton School District No. 2 v. Superintendent of Public Instruction

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1949No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 44,213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This appeal presents the question of the proper construction of section 9, chapter 5, part 1, of the Michigan school code, Act No. 319, Pub. Acts 1927 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 7180 [Stat. Ann. § 15.100]). This section 9 reads:

“Whenever the county commissioner of schools is presented with a petition or petitions requesting him to submit to the legal school electors the question of establishing a rural agricultural school, he shall refer to the superintendent of public instruction for his opinion as to the advisability of uniting all of said territory into one rural agricultural school district.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geister v. School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ulrich v. Fractional School District No. 5Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bradley v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Bradley v. MillikenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
  4. Imlay Township Primary School District No. 5 v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. IMLAY TWP. PRIMARY SCH. DIST. v. State Bd. of Edn.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API