Legal Opinion

Moe v. Beck

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1991No. CC 87-0828; CA A49767; SC S36916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.

The defendant is a leasing company that leased a truck to one James Beck. The lease describes the defendant as the ‘ ‘ owner’ ’ of the truck. A worker was injured while driving the truck and brought an action against the defendant, claiming that the defendant had the responsibilities of an “owner” under ORS 654.022 (which is a part of the Oregon Safe Employment Act (OSEA)). On summary judgment, the trial court ruled against the plaintiff. The Court of Appeals reversed, stating that “because [the defendant] holds record title to the vehicle, it is the ‘owner’ as the term is defined in ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Pedro v. JanuaryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Binhoff v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. California Oregon Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Moe v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Burke v. State Ex Rel. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. OR-OSHA v. Laborworks Ind. / Tradesman Int.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. OR-OSHA v. Laborworks Ind. / Tradesman Int.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Groeneweg v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API