Legal Opinion

C. L. Smith Oil Co. v. Riggs

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1916No. 7201Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

At a former term of this court we concluded thgt, as the plaintiff had alleged several specific injuries to his person by reason of the accident complained of and had not alleged any injury to his eyes, it was error for the trial court to permit the plaintiff’s attending physician to testify that his principal injury was to his eyes, and having reached such conclusion, and because of the admission of such testimony, we reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for retrial. Pending a motion for rehearing by appellee, we certified to the Supreme Court (230 S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. C. L. Smith Oil Co. v. RiggsTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. City National Bank v. ColginCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API