Legal Opinion

Denoto v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 14, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

Defendant moves to set aside notice of taking a deposition which specifies the persons to be examined as “the defendant by its officers, and more particularly by its employee, James Basham” on the ground that plaintiff has not identified which officer from whom it seeks to take a deposition, and that the named employee is not an officer, director or managing agent within the purview of Rule 26(d)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., by whom the deposition of a corporation may be taken.

A notice of the taking of the deposition of a corporation should…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spaeth v. WarNer Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Dorothy McAllisterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Williams v. Lehigh Valley RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Cleveland v. PalmbyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API