Carey v. Habersham Hardware & Distributing Co.

After the court had heard and determined evidence on the rule nisi to make Arrendale a party defendant, the court refused to make Arrendale a party defendant and refused to continue the case, whereupon the defendant filed exceptions pendente lite to the judgment refusing to make Arrendale a party defendant and denying the motion for a continuance. The act of 1953 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dee. Sess., pp. 440-458) abolished exceptions pendente lite. See Beard, v. Westmoreland, 90 Ga. App. 632 (84 S. E. 2d 93). There is no assignment of error in the bill of exceptions regarding the judgment refusing…