Legal Opinion

Caetano v. Shaughnessy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 29, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKS, District Judge.

On the ground that after admission to the United States as a visitor for pleasure petitioner failed to comply with the conditions of such status, the Immigration and Naturalization Service ordered his deportation. Petitioner thereupon instituted this proceeding to review said determination. The respondent then moved to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The parties have submitted affidavits and, upon the argument, the respondent handed up *212the entire administrative file. The motion will therefore be treated as one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Bugajewitz v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States Ex Rel. Zapp v. District Director of Immigration & NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. Couto v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vlisidis v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Da Costa v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. PANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API