Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hill v. National Auto Glass Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 5, 1968No. 49947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff is in the business of installing and servicing automobile glass, and his suit charges Count II of the several defendants with boycott activities directed against him. Defendant Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), which is involved in the business of writing insurance and adjusting claims in the automobile casualty insurance field, is alleged to be transacting business within California and it is alleged that Allstate makes arrangements on behalf of its assureds and claimants for the sale, installation, and service of…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Schwartz v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Phillip M. Proctor, D/B/A Proctor Auto Service v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Ballard v. Blue Shield of Southern West Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. Continental American Life Insurance v. City of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API