Legal Opinion

Rothman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover damages for trespass.

1Opinion of the CourtDayton, J.

Plaintiff brought this action October 17, 1908, to recover $5,000 damages for trespass and for an injunction restraining the operation of defendant’s railroad in front of the premises at the northwest corner of Second avenue and Twenty-fifth street, being twenty-five feet eight and one-fourth inches on Second avenue, and for the purposes of this action sixty-five feet on Twenty-fifth street, to *379which- he took title February 13, 1906. Defendant urges that in May, 1879, the construction of its road was begun in front of said premises and was essentially completed in January, 1880, and remained…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Storck v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Dorfman v. HirschfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Gladstone Equity Exchange Co. v. HinesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API