Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernard Seidling
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 16, 2013No. 13-1854PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant, Bernard C. Sei-dling (“Seidling”), was charged with creating and executing a scheme to defraud by knowingly mailing documents containing false information to small claims courts in Wisconsin and hiding the filings of the actions from the named defendants. Sei-dling stipulated to the facts of the charge and waived his right to a jury trial. Sei-dling then moved for a judgment of acquittal; he argued that the elements of the mail fraud statute could not be met because he never intended the false statements and misrepresentations to be communicated to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 26,490 United States of America v. William R. Kennedy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Andres GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. John T. Burns, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. David WeimertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Maria RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Felix DanielCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.