Legal Opinion

Archbold v. Helvering

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 2, 1940No. Nos. 39-42PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents no other questions than those decided in Van Vranken v. Helvering, 2 Cir., 115 F.2d 709, handed down herewith. It is true that here the trusts were not testamentary; but had been set up by a deed of the taxpayer’s ancestor, executed in 1910. The relevant statute is not § 113 (a) (5) of the Act of 1934, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 697, but § 113(a) (4) of the Act of 1932, 26 U.S. C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 515, and that has remained unchanged from the time of its first enactment in 1921. This might have required some separate consideration, if we had depended upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Vranken v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Dolbeer v. HartenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Archbold v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API