Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1956No. A-12362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWELL, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged in the municipal criminal court of Tulsa, Tulsa County, by information for driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; was tried before a jury, convicted, and punishment fixed by the court at ten days confinement in the county jail, and to pay a fine of $75.

For reversal defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling her demurrer to the evidence, and her motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the State’s evidence.

The inquiry, then, is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hopper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Linzey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Crossett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Matlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Parris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Denney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Harris v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Stevison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API