Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These are appeals from separate orders denying applications for leave to file notices of claim after the expiration of ninety days, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Order denying application of appellant Mollie Rosenberg affirmed, without costs. The appellant as well as someone on her behalf was capable of executing a notice within the statutory period. (Matter of Halloran v. Board of Educ. of City of N. 7., 271 App. Div. 830; Matter of Haas v. Incorporated Tillage of Cedarhurst, 272 App. Div. 1031; Matter of Sullivan v. Town of Babylon, 277 App. Div.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Biancoviso v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Johnson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Kelsch v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. In re the Appointment of a Committee of the Person & Property of BarrotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API