Havens v. Havens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts, upon the ground that Mary J. Brady did not intend to transfer to Carrie B. Havens any interest in the account which should be operative during her lifetime; she intended to exercise sole dominion over the fund so long as she lived; that her intent was merely testamentary. Present — ■ Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
2Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Green's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of LofmarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
- Brumer v. BrumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Claim of Houston v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Scanlan v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.