Legal Opinion

Dreyfus v. Goss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1903No. 13,103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Chautauqua district court; G. P. Airman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J.:

This was an action to recover the price of intoxicating liquors. We prefer to solve the various incidental and subordinate matters raised in the briefs by the discussion and determination of the two main questions, rather than by a discussion of these subordinate questions in detail, as we think a solution of the main questions will solve all the lesser ones.

*58Plaintiffs were wholesale liquor dealers doing business in Kansas City, Mo. Defendants were druggists doing business in Elgin, Kan. It is not shown that they had authority under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Banks v. EverestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Keith v. Herschberg Optical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Thomas Kane & Co. v. BarstowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Boylan v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Limb v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API