Legal Opinion

Connor v. Picard

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 16, 1970No. Misc. Civ. No. 68-88-GPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRITY, District Judge.

Petitioner for habeas corpus, Connor, and a codefendant Landry were found *844guilty on March 25, 1966 of murder in the first degree of Davis. The crime was committed on May 1, 1965. The jury recommended that the death penalty not be imposed and petitioner is serving a life sentence. Codefendants named Doherty were found guilty of being accessories. Petitioner’s conviction was affirmed on appeal, Commonwealth v. Doherty, 353 Mass. 197, 229 N.E.2d 267, decided August 22,1967.

The petition for habeas corpus asserts seven numbered grounds for relief, but without…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Connor v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. State v. PurringtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. De ChristoforoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. De ChristoforoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API