Legal Opinion

Adams v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 13, 1979No. SS-254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is before us upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of counsel and that he was not allowed to withdraw a coerced guilty plea.

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 provides a means of relief whereby such issues may be addressed. Petitioner’s failure to assert exhaustion of this remedy precludes habeas relief. Henderson v. State, 184 So.2d 646 (Fla.1966); Zuniga v. State, 184 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), cert. denied, 189 So.2d 635 (Fla.1966), cert denied, 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 404, 17 L.Ed.2d 307 (1966); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Accordingly, said petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuniga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hart v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Steppe v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API