Legal Opinion

Hartvickson v. Haugen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2011No. 20100165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Stacy L. Haugen appeals the district court’s order determining testacy and settlement of account, and closing of Bryan K. Haugen’s estate. We reverse and remand for the district court to enter an order awarding Stacy Haugen the entire estate and to make the necessary findings of fact on the issues in dispute.

I

[¶ 2] Bryan Haugen died in July 2006. He was separated from his wife Stacy Haugen. Bryan Haugen was predeceased by both his parents. Bryan Haugen executed a will giving all his property to S. Scott Hartviekson, a family friend. S. Scott Hartviekson predeceased…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rothberg v. RothbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re Estate of HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Klose v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jordan v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Estate of CashmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wicklund v. WicklundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Curtiss A. Hogen Trust B v. HogenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Estate of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Eagon v. McKeownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Nusviken v. JohnstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API