Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Marriage of Bozarth

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 2, 1989No. 88SC244Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Rovira

While I agree with the majority that communications between spouses made during the marriage are privileged, even in a child custody proceeding, I disagree that David Brady’s (husband) testimony concerning his observations of his wife’s activities is also precluded. Therefore, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

This court has held that the spousal privilege statute must be strictly construed because of the privilege’s tendency to obstruct full disclosure of the truth. Petro-Lewis Corp. v. District Court, 727 P.2d 41 (Colo.1986); Keeler v. Russum, 68 Colo. 196, 189 P. 255…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. McMillin v. McMillinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Oakes v. OakesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Rayer v. RayerColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. E.P. v. District Court of Garfield CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API