Bienenstok v. Ammidown
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
Action by Siegfried Bienenstok and others against Edward H. Ammidown and others.
1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.
The plaintiffs, wool dealers at St. Louis, Mo., in September, 1890, sold to a corporation known as the “Rittenhouse Manufacturing Company,” located at Passaic, N. J., a quantity of wool, aggregating in value about $34,888.17. The transaction on the part of the Rittenhouse Company was conducted by Mr. Gardner, its manager, through a firm of wool brokers, known as “Salter Bros.” Mr. Ammidown, one of the defendants, was president of the Rittenhouse Manufacturing Company, and at the same time senior member of the firm of Ammidown & Smith, composed of the defendants. Ammidown owned about 90 per…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Manhattan Sav. Inst.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Bienenstok v. AmmidownNew York Supreme Court · 1895