Logan v. Gedney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Second District, Tehama County. The ease is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sprague, J„, delivered the opinion of the Court:
The question presented on this appeal was directly raised on appellant’s- motion for nonsuit in the Court below, after plaintiff had closed his testimony and rested his case.
The action is based upon a statute of this State, entitled “An Act to restrict the herding of sheep ” (Statutes 1861, p. 523), as amended March 28, 1868 (Statutes 1867-8, p. 426), the first section of which reads as follows : “It shall not be lawful for any person or persons owning or having charge of any sheep, to herd the same, or permit them to be herded, on the land or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richmond v. Sacramento Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1861
- Waters v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Comerford v. DupuyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by7 opinions
- Herzberg v. County of PlumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Blevins v. MullallyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Hahn v. GarrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Jones v. BlytheUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Merritt v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.