Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Love

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 18, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The questions arising on these appeals depend for their decision upon the proper construction to he given to the residuary clause of the will of Alexander Lorman who died in 1812. The testator gave “all the rest and residue ” of his estate to two persons in trust, to divide the same into two equal parts, and then to hold one part in trust for certain persons who are not concerned in this appeal, and in certain contingencies to pay the same to the “ trustees of the Baltimore Asylum for the Blind.” Then follows this language: “ The other one-half of the said rest and residue of my estate I…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hinkley v. WheelwrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Larmour v. RichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  2. Lumpkin v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  3. Reilly v. BristowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. Wesley Home, Inc. v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Lee v. WaltjenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API