Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 2001No. D036744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

Under principles of workers’ compensation law, an employee commuting to or from work is generally not considered to be acting within the scope of his or her employment at that time. (Dimmig v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 6 Cal.3d 860, 865-866 [101 Cal.Rptr. 105, 495 P.2d 433].) This principle, which is known as the “going and coming” rule, is subject to an exception where the commuting employee is on a special mission or errand for the employer. (Id. at p. 868.) We hold that a police officer whose duties include testifying in court is not on a special mission while…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Santa Rosa Junior College v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Baroid v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. C. L. Pharris Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Feltham v. Universal Protection Service, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API