Legal Opinion

Leyenberger v. Paul

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 5, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.

This is the fourth time this case has been here. 12 Ill. App. 635; 17 Ill. App. 167; 25 Ill. App. 480. No discussion of the real merits of the case is in any of the opinions there reported.

On the last appeal it was said that this court was not “ entirely satisfied ” that there was a want of probable cause for the criminal prosecution, to recover damages for which this action was brought. Whether there was evidence of the other elements of such a cause of action, is not alluded to in either report.

The relation between these parties existed by written agreements. The first is:

“ Chicago,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Langford v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Rae v. HulbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Lœwenthal v. StrengIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Ames v. SniderIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Brown v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Hess v. Missouri Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1987
  3. Martin v. WahlCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  4. Ruble v. CohnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  5. Halberstadt v. New York InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API