Legal Opinion

Trent v. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1900No. 554PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from tire Circuit Court of the United States lor the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The appellee, as the assignee of letters patent No. 588,884, issued on May 7, 1895, to August H. Schierholz, of San Francisco, for improvement in ore crushers, brought suit against the appellant, alleging infringement of said letters patent. The circuit court entered an interlocutory decree adjudging that the letters patent were valid, and that the appellant had infringed the same, and enjoining and restraining him from further infringement. From that decree this appeal is taken. The following are the drawings of the crusher:

*637

*638

The improvement which is covered by the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claude Siebring D/B/A Siebring Manufacturing Company, and Owen Siebring v. Charles W. Hansen and Afsco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Jones v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Weyerhaeuser Timber Company v. Bostitch, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  4. Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Manufacturing Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1962
  5. National Mechanical Directory Co v. PolkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API