Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. NCH Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 2015No. 110912644; A154902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

Plaintiff, personal representative of the estate of Rodney Gale Lunsford (decedent), appeals from a judgment dismissing her product liability action against defendant Dynacco, Inc., because the action was not commenced within 10 years of sale of the product, as required by ORS 30.905(3)(b) (2008), amended by Oregon Laws 2009, chapter 485, section 1 (the product liability statute of ultimate repose).1 Plaintiff argues that ORS 30.905(3)(b) (2008) violates the Oregon Constitution, specifically the remedy clause of Article I, section 10, and the jury trial clause of Article I, section 17. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jensen v. WhitlowOregon Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lunsford v. NCH Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API