Fleming v. Copeland
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
it is, of course, well settled that a decree may be in part final and in part interlocutory merely, and that there may, in this sense, be several final decrees. Jones v. Wilson, 54 Ala. 50; Broughton v. Wimberly, 65 Ala. 549; Cochran v. Miller, 74 Ala. 50; Adams v. Sayre, 76 Ala. 509; Gainer v. Jones, 176 Ala. 408, 58 South. 288.
It is contended by appellee that the decree of October 12, 1921, was, as to the disputed items of account therein determined on exceptions to the register’s report, a final decree which could be reviewed only by an appeal therefrom within six months; and hence that it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Cochran v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Garner v. PrewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Jones v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Paulling v. Creagh's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chandler v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- BURKES MECH. v. Ft. James-Pennington, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Carver v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- First Nat. Bank of Opp v. CottonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.