Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Duff
Supreme Court of Colorado
1ConcurrenceJustice Frantz
There is antagonism of view between the opinions of Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Doyle, and both, I maintain, hold positions opposed to established principles of law. Since I would not have this court place in jeopardy or forsake time-tested rules, I would state briefly why I concur in the result only of the opinion of Mr. Justice Hall.
I am persuaded that the casualty forming the basis of this suit was the result of an unfortunate accident in which neither party was at fault. Criteria for responsibility are subjective in this case; we must consider the circumstances as they affected the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mouso v. Bellingham & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- St. Louis, I. M. S. R. Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Engberg v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Western Maryland Railway Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Higgins v. Wilmington City Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1895