Legal Opinion

Hatcher v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 29, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Affirming.

Appellant, Walter Hatcher, as plaintiff in the trial court, sought a sale for the purpose of partition of a tract of land on Abbott’s creek, known as the William Bayes land. The defendants were thte devisees under a will made by his grandmother, Elizabeth Jane 'Worsham Elliott.

Walter Hatcher claims to be the owner of seventy-one eightieths of this land. By his petition, Thomas Wilson Elliott, the relict and devisee of Elizabeth Jane Worsham Elliott, was permitted to make himself a party. He asserted in himself the ownership of a life estate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Rice v. KletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Duke v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ely v. United States Coal Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. McGinnis v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API