Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Koontz

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1993No. 23862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Appellant South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) appeals the denial of summary judgment based upon a statute of limitations defense.

We affirm.

FACTS

On January 21, 1989, Respondent Pamela Parrish was involved in a car wreck with Defendant Linda Starnes Koontz. Subsequently, Parrish and her husband, Respondent Steven Parrish sued Koontz. This action was filed January 17, 1992, prior to the three-year statute of limitations.1

The Parrishes carried underinsured motorist coverage with Farm Bureau, which was served with notice of the above action through…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Baptist Church of Mauldin v. City of MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Hardee v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Willis Ex Rel. Willis v. BishopSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Franklin v. DevoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API