Legal Opinion
Albin v. Qwest Communications Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 24, 2002No. CIV.01-1304-STPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Magistrate Janice M. Stewart filed her Findings and Recommendation (# 15) on December 4, 2001 (the “F & R”) and referred it to me on January 8, 2002. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.CivJP. 72(b).
When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Skillin v. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Perl v. Laux/Arnold, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Skillin v. Rady Children's Hospital-San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017