Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kale Flagg v. Denise Elliot

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2016No. 14-31169Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

HAYNES, Circuit Judge,

joined by DENNIS, ELROD and GRAVES, Circuit Judges, concxxxring and dissenting:

Our prior decision in Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 385 F.3d 568 (5th Cir.2004) (en banc), has garnered much confusion and criticism.1 Instead of *141clarity, the majority opinion unnecessarily adds yet , another layer to the already expansive view of Smallwood. Properly applied, the Smallwood test would result in a conclusion that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over this ease. From the majority opinion’s determination that we have jurisdiction, I respectfully dissent. •

Under…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API