Kale Flagg v. Denise Elliot
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
HAYNES, Circuit Judge,
joined by DENNIS, ELROD and GRAVES, Circuit Judges, concxxxring and dissenting:
Our prior decision in Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 385 F.3d 568 (5th Cir.2004) (en banc), has garnered much confusion and criticism.1 Instead of *141clarity, the majority opinion unnecessarily adds yet , another layer to the already expansive view of Smallwood. Properly applied, the Smallwood test would result in a conclusion that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over this ease. From the majority opinion’s determination that we have jurisdiction, I respectfully dissent. •
Under…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.