Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fox

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM RHEA. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Rhea County.—T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

On February 11, 1899, the assignor of the complainants recovered a judgment in the chancery court at Dayton, Tenn., for $1,826.75, against Sarah Fox, J. E. Line, and S. M. Winchester jointly, which, by a chain of subsequent assignments, became the property of complain*338ants. Burkett, Miller and Mansfield, and for tfieir use held by and in the name of W. B. Miller, trustee.

On July 31, 1899, Miller, trustee, was paid $1,000 on this judgment by J. E. Line for himself and Winchester jointly.

Such proceedings were had in respect of this judgment as that an execution was issued and levied upon certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank v. ShookTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Quality Care Nursing Services, Inc. v. ColemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kreutzmann v. BaumanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Winer v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API