Miller v. Fox
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM RHEA. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Rhea County.—T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
On February 11, 1899, the assignor of the complainants recovered a judgment in the chancery court at Dayton, Tenn., for $1,826.75, against Sarah Fox, J. E. Line, and S. M. Winchester jointly, which, by a chain of subsequent assignments, became the property of complain*338ants. Burkett, Miller and Mansfield, and for tfieir use held by and in the name of W. B. Miller, trustee.
On July 31, 1899, Miller, trustee, was paid $1,000 on this judgment by J. E. Line for himself and Winchester jointly.
Such proceedings were had in respect of this judgment as that an execution was issued and levied upon certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bank v. ShookTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cole v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Quality Care Nursing Services, Inc. v. ColemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Kreutzmann v. BaumanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Winer v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932