Hassett v. Rust
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from, Howard County Circuit Court. Williams vs. Powers, 51 Mo. 441 ; Wagn. Stat. 910, § 9 ; 909, §§ 5, 8 ; Kerr vs. Mut. Ins. Co., 40 Mo. 19 ; Bowling vs. McFarland, 38 Mo. 365 ; Baker vs. Berry, 37 Mo. 306 ; Id. 603 ; Chambers vs. Carthel, 25 Mo. 374; and contended that under Wagn. Stat. 1020, § 38, the mere items of the account were all that were intended to be set forth when it permitted it to be filed.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, Judge
court.
Plaintiffs commenced their action in the circuit court of Randolph county against appellant and D. F. Kimmel, to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the property described in the petition, alleging that Kimmel Was an original contractor, employed by inis co-defendants to build for them a dwelling house on the lots in question, and that the lumber and nails specified in the account were sold to Kimmel and used by him in the construction of said dwelling house ; that on the 15th day of March, 1874, plaintiff filed with the clerk of the Randolph circuit court a just and true account of their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Jones v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Stewart ex rel. Sibley v. GarvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vasquez v. Village Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Holland v. CunliffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Steinmann v. StrimpleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Augir v. WarderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Nugent v. CurranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.