Hargrave v. State

KNOLL, J.,

additionally concurring.

Ill agree with the majority, but write separately to express my concerns with the legal regime set up to provide our State’s injured workers with vocational rehabilitation services. In my view, this system does not currently serve the best interests of our injured workers and impacts the quid pro quo that is the foundation of the Workers’ Compensation Act.

First, I subscribe to the majority opinion because there is no record evidence establishing a dispute between Hargrave and Diaz concerning the quality of Diaz’s services, or that Diaz, in this case, failed…