Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Authority v. Stepanik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1978No. 35PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Mary Stepanik owned, but did not occupy, a residential apartment building renting living space to others. A board of viewers awarded appellant general damages of $23,000 under the Eminent Domain Code1 for the taking of the building by appellee Redevelopment Authority of Allegheny County. The board of viewers also awarded appellant $10,000 of additional, special dislocation damages under Section 601 — A(b)(3) of the Code, 26 P.S. § l-601A(b)(3). Appellee appealed the board’s award of $10,000 to the Court *201of Common Pleas of Allegheny County,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tri County Service Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  2. Redevelopment Authority v. LegoshCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Western Pennsylvania Water Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Carlynton School District v. HaysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Becker v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API