Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane A. Lebedeff, J.
Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction under a local law which regulates hiring of "strikebreakers” as defined under that local law. Defendants (Greyhound) cross-move for dismissal of the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).
Greyhound Lines, one of the largest bus lines in the Nation, *602operates in New York City and in thousands of localities from coast to coast. The Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1202, represents Greyhound bus drivers in New York City. A strike of drivers began on March 2, 1990, after a collective bargaining agreement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.