Legal Opinion

Little v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 2006No. A06A1144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, Eual M. Little’s truck and Dorothy Little’s cellular telephone were forfeited to the State on the ground that their son used the truck and cellular phone while engaging in the sale of marijuana. Eual and Dorothy Little appeal the forfeiture, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to find that they were innocent owners of the property. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The evidence shows that on May 9, 2003, the Littles’ son, Matthew, sold a quantity of marijuana to a confidential police informant. Matthew used Dorothy’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. James Buchanan v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Rosa Nelson v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API