Legal Opinion

Varner v. Eppley, Admr

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. 23385PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

There are eleven assignments of error made by the plaintiff in error. The first, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth allege that the court failed to charge certain law germane to the case. In the second assignment, it is claimed that the court erred in attempting to define the issues by propounding three interrogatories, using practically the exact language of the three special charges of negligence. The third assignment alleges that the trial court erred in that in propounding the three interrogatories to the jury the court found and determined the ultimate facts, instead…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Case v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Hammond v. RayOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API