Legal Opinion
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 19, 1969No. 41337PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
170 N.W.2d 865 (1969)
Therese M. THILL, Appellant,
v.
MODERN ERECTING COMPANY; Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc.; J. L. Shiely Company and Jesco, Inc., Respondents.
No. 41337.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
September 19, 1969.
DeParcq, Anderson & Perl, and Richard G. Hunegs, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Faegre & Benson, Wright Brooks and Paul J. McGough, Minneapolis, for Modern Erecting Co.
Kain & Kressel, Minneapolis, for Johnson, Drake, etc.
Robb, Robb & Van Eps, Minneapolis, for Shiely.
Hoppe & Healy, Minneapolis, for Jesco.
OPINION
PETERSON, Justice.
Plaintiff, Therese M. Thill, whose husband, Edward L. Thill,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Berghammer v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Wilson v. HasvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1987
- Bradley R. Gray and Anastasia B. Gray v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.