Legal Opinion

Goode v. Pierce Oil Corporation

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). Plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon the negligence of the defendants in selling to her what she had a right to assume was standard kerosene, when the oil purchased was' a mixture of kerosene and gasoline.

The evidence was sufficient to allow the question of negligence of the defendants to be submitted to the jury. It tended to show that the oil, which was purchased by the plaintiff for kerosene, was a mixture of kerosene and gasoline, which flashed at 60 degrees Fahrenheit. According to the United States specifications, kerosene should not flash at a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1904
  2. McLawson v. Paragon Repining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Morrison v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Richardson v. Farmers Union Oil CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Parton v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Sinclair Refining Company v. PilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Sinclair Refining Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API