Rhudy v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Ellis. Tried below before Hon. J. E. Dillard. Appeal from a conviction of forgery; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The charging part of the indictment, which was claimed to be insufficient, is set out in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted under the first count of the indictment for forgery, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. Hence this appeal.
Appellant questions the validity of the indictment. The conviction was under the first count, for forgery, and the judgment and sentence followed the verdict of the jury. The charging part of the first count of the indictment is as follows: That appellant, J. W. Ehudy, “ * * * without lawful authority, and with intent to injure and defraud, did unlawfully, willfully, and fraudulently make a false instrument in…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte HolbrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Forcy, Alias Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Huckaby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.