Legal Opinion
Rimmer-Bey v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1995No. 93-2082PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
62 F.3d 789
Ricky RIMMER-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert BROWN; Kenneth McGinnis; Daniel Bolden; Raymond
Palmer; Bruce Wood; Z. Tyszkiewicz; John Hawley; Robert
Wood; and Kenneth Epps, in their individual and official
capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-2082.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued March 10, 1995.
Decided Aug. 9, 1995.
Daniel E. Manville (argued and briefed), Ann Arbor, MI, for Ricky Rimmer-Bey.
Thomas A. Kulick, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued and briefed), Office of Atty. Gen., Corrections Div., Lansing, MI, for Robert Brown, Jr., Daniel Bolden, Dennis Dyke, Z.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Rimmer-Bey v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Mertik v. BlalockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by108 opinions
- Alphonso Samuels v. J. Mockry, G. Hewston, W. Higgins and J. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Beverati v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Luken v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Timothy Finley v. Erica HussCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Rienholtz v. CampbellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.