People v. Sherman

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from *895a judgment convicting her after a jury trial of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and falsifying business records in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.10). Defendant contends that the conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence because the People failed to establish that it was she, rather than someone else in the office where she was employed, who stole the money from her employer and altered her employer’s computer records. That contention is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05…