Legal Opinion

Overfield v. Starbucks

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 19, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02014Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BREANN K. OVERFIELD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-2014-JWB STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. (Doc. 29.) The motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. (Docs. 30; 36; 39.) For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background On January 11, 2019, Plaintiff Breann K. Overfield, then-proceeding pro se, filed a form employment discrimination Complaint in this Court against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Augusta Bank & Trust v. BroomfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API