Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilkinson

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1955No. 288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Petitioner, a military prisoner at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, makes application in for-ma pauperis for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition being entirely inadequate, he was directed to supplement same with any specific facts upon which petitioner predicated his allegations.1 Such supplement, when filed, was likewise inadequate but out of abundant caution a Rule issued and an opportunity was given petitioner to file a traverse to any response filed in order that a complete picture would be before the Court in passing on the petition. A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Hiatt v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Humphrey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bokoros v. KearneyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1956
  2. Prentiss v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API