Legal Opinion

Gardenhire v. Glasser

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1924No. Civil No. 2222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

— A writ of garnishment was levied upon a debt due the appellant Gardenhire from an *504insurance company, as proceeds of a fire insurance policy covering the dwelling-house of Gardenhire, situated upon an unpatented homestead, claimed and occupied by himself and family.under the provisions of the federal homestead statutes. Eevised Statutes of the United States, par. 2289 (U. S. Comp. Stats. § 4530).

This fund was claimed by Gardenhire as exempt, and disallowed. Eevised Statutes of the United States, par. 2296 (U. S. Comp. Stats., § 4551); Eevised Statutes of Arizona, par. 3302, subdiv. 16.

Whether…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faull v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Towner v. RodegebWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Houghton v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Reynolds v. HainesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Harris v. LyonArizona Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re ThiemUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  2. Plant v. Goernitz (In Re Plant)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  3. Garcia v. Warfield (In re Garcia)District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  4. KARA FRANCES JENNINGSUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API