Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beu v. Lockwood

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Bremer District Court. — J. J. Clark, Judge. Action to test the legality of the attempted consolidation of certain territory in Bremer and Fayette Counties into a consolidated school district. There was a trial to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff’s petition was' dismissed, and it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

1. Schools axd SCHOOL DISTRICTS : consolidation : election: failure to provide separate ballot boxes. Upon the refusal of the county attorneys to bring suit, a judge of the district court gave relators leave to commence action. Plaintiffs thereupon filed their petition, and alleged, in substance, that they are property owners and taxpayers *1235within the limits of the territory of the proposed school district; that defendants are exercising authority illegally, as the pretended officers and directors of the pretended school district; that there is in fact no such school distinct, because no valid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Dishon v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Pennington v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Strebin v. LavengoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Warrington v. Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Little v. OwensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. McRobbie v. Registrars of Voters of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. State v. Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Dusey v. Creston Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API