Legal Opinion

Pizzolato v. Field

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1983No. 82-CA-0990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

441 So.2d 1248 (1983)

Francis PIZZOLATO, Francis A. Pizzolato and Pizzolato Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

v.

Elmer FIELD, Jr., et ux.

No. 82-CA-0990.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

November 22, 1983.

William C. Shockey, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellants Francis Pizzolato, et al.

J. Huntington Odom, John L. Dardenne, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee Elmer Field, Jr., et al.

Before EDWARDS, WATKINS and SHORTESS, JJ.

WATKINS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Francis Pizzolato, Francis A. Pizzolato and Pizzolato Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., appeal the granting of defendants' motion for a partial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Hanover Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Dryades Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. LassiterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Beard v. Assumption Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Landry v. John E. Graham & Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Lloyd's UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Succession of Crowe v. HenryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Brennan v. Shell Offshore, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API