Legal Opinion

Haines v. Cook Electric Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell D. Schweitzer, J.

This is a motion by the deceased plaintiff’s wife, who is the administratrix of his estate, for an order .substituting her as the plaintiff in the action in place and instead of the deceased.

The action seeks the recovery of $16,000,000 for legal services rendered and is predicated upon an Argentine statute which allegedly provides that an attorney may not accept a sum of less than 2% of the contract’s value.

The action has been pending here for some time, with substantial pretrial procedures having been conducted, at least up to the time of plaintiff’s death. Plaintiff was an Argentine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Kirkbride v. Van NoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Montgomery v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Neuberger v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Gibb v. ChisholmNew York Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pressman v. Estate of SteinvorthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. TAG 380, LLC v. Estate of RonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API